Child Sacrifice

Daniel Tragerman, a smiling, charming four-year-old Israeli child in a soccer jersey, died in a shrapnel storm near Gaza. A few miles away the child of Hamas leader Mohammed Deif was killed when a bunker-buster bomb leveled their home. A few hundred miles to the northeast, James Foley, older, but still someone’s child, was horrifically beheaded before the cameras by an ISIS gang – including, some say, a British-born radical.

Is this what we signed up for? Is this civilization in the 21st century?

As we approach the Yamim Noraim, the Jewish Days of awe between Rosh Hashanah and Yom Kippur, we are living through a time when earthly awe is coming at us like bullets. We are living in a time of great challenges, and we must face them. And we must ask what our reactions say about our own humanity.

We cannot claim the catastrophe in Gaza is one-sided. The blame lies everywhere. Israel forced Gaza Jews to leave the place – judenrein – to the locals. There was a potential for change and promise, but Hamas was elected to govern Gaza and they trashed the Jewish businesses handed to them and began rocketing Israel. Swearing to destroy Israel, they attacked as terrorists, kidnapping soldiers and civilians, firing indiscriminately at their enemy.

But Israel is not blameless. They turned Gaza into a refugee camp, blockading the ports, closing the borders, limiting economic development and creating a mini-state mired in poverty and bereft of hope. Living in Gaza today, even before the latest battles, is impossible.

There is plenty of blame to be assigned, and this is not about moral or political equivalences. Not with one side vowing to – and trying to – wipe the other off the face of the earth. No, the question I raise is: what does this say about our own humanity. Are we little more than tribal? Assuming our side is all right, blaming the other for all the chaos? I don’t have an answer. Only the question we must face: Where is our humanity? How can we tolerate, even cheer on, “our side,” whatever that may be? And what have we done about it? What can we do?

Which leads to another question: We must ask what the reactions of our leaders say about their humanity. And their leadership.

I have come to feel our President has let us all down. I have defended Barack Obama against many bitter attacks. Some were clearly instilled by a feeling that his race made him less of an American, less “one of us.” Many of the attacks were just political, or foolish or just plain wrong. I voted for him twice, and given the opportunity to vote for the other guy today, I would vote for Obama again because his instincts on most issues reflect mine.

And I believe that after two wars and an economic catastrophe, this nation needed some downtime, some time to heal. And that’s what Obama’s “don’t do stupid stuff” foreign policy was designed to accomplish. Up to a point.

Right up to the point where our humanity gets involved. Here is the sticking point. There must be a point where a great nation takes a strong stand and says, no. No more “collateral damage.” No more beheadings. No more child sacrifice.

We went to war in Afghanistan and Iraq because, we claimed, there were weapons of mass destruction. Well, we are still in a battle of mass destruction, one person at a time. One child at a time.

“Rules in a knife fight,” says Butch Cassidy. The response: “There are no rules in a knife fight.”

Well, great nations sometimes have to say, yes, there are rules. And we damn well better live by them, or we all die by them. One child at a time. One thread in our tapestry of civilization at a time.

On Yom Kippur we recite the prayer “Eleh Ezkerah,” meaning “these I remember,” and we recite the names of martyrs who died two thousand years ago. Some synagogues add verses about the Holocaust. This year, Daniel Tragerman, Mohammed Deif’s child and Daniel Foley are on my list.

3 thoughts on “Child Sacrifice

  1. Barbara Byer says:

    Enough is enough. There is blame enough to go around. But if there is a starting point, isn’t it agreement that Israel has a right to exist? Without that basic understanding, where is there to go? I agree with everything you have said, but the deeper question is, what are the options going forward so that the killing stops and the healing can truly begin.


  2. mkaplanblog says:

    I think a radical solution needs to emerge. And it can only come from the major powers. After all, what is power for, if not to make a difference. And there are different kinds of powers at play here. The power of money from Qatar, for instance, provides unlimited funds to build the tunnels and keep Hamas in business. Can the US do nothing? The “talks” and cease fires are meaningless unless someone exerts the muscle. And here is where it appears the US either doesn’t care enough or doesn’t have the creative will to act.


  3. rodger11 says:

    Yes, there is a starting point, but the question is – where is that starting point? For some it is that Israel has a right to exist. And to exist freely and not under an iron dome is seclusion amidst unfriendly neighbors. For others the starting point is that they were removed from their land and placed in ghettos on the West Bank, in Gaza and in Jordan with no right of return.
    There is so much back and forth on this that it is like the question – which came first, the chicken or the egg? It just so happens that there is an answer to that particular question, if you go back far enough you will come to the conclusion that the egg came first. That would be the egg that contained the first chicken which had mutated from whatever the creature was that laid the egg which contained that first chicken. Of course this answer is unacceptable to those that don’t believe in evolution.
    Perhaps examining all the terrible things the Israelis did/are doing to the Palestinians and all the terrible things the Palestinians did/are doing to the Israelis is more like peeling away the layers of an onion – a very large onion with a seemingly unending number of layers. One could say that peeling an onion is a Sisyphean task. And if all the layers were to be peeled away, what would be left? The kernel in the center of the onion is not a “thing” for which one can find a fossil to examine as that first layer was “something that happened” which cannot now be reviewed. Partly because there is no record of the blameless person who threw the first stone (who could then be blamed) and partly because there are so many other parties involved – The Greeks, Romans, Persians, Nazi, British (the makers of maps), Americans, other Arab states, etc. – that blame becomes too defused.
    But when there is no there there it becomes a zero-sum game and someone needs to unthrow the first rock.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s